Negasonic Teenage Warhead was actually a trade off. Disney wanted to use Ego the Living Planet in GOTGV2 but Fox owned it at the time. Deadpool writers not only wanted to use Negasonic Teenage Warhead but also significantly change her abilities. So Fox and Disney did a trade.

The way the rights work is when a studio purchased film rights to a character they also buy the character and all associated characters. If those characters happen to appear in multiple works besides the namesake the studio purchased (with exception of the titular character(s)) then they have no choice but to share the rights of those characters with Marvel or another studio. But most studios won't share the characters in tandem with a shared universe. Perfect example of this is the use of Quick Silver in both Fox's X-Men franchise and Disney's MCU. Theoretically Sony and Fox could have done the same thing with Kingpin back in the early 00's. We did see this with Disney/Netflix's Daredevil and Sony's Spider-Man: Into the Spiderverse in this recent decade.

Sony and Disney's deal allowed Spider-Man to be shared in the MCU. Only Spider-Man/Peter Parker, Aunt May, and Ned were allowed in the MCU proper. Each film Sony made the two studios had to agree on what characters Sony and what characters Disney were willing to share. So if the deal is truly dead only Tom Holland's Spider-Man is allowed to be kept in future installments. All other Sony owned characters will have to be rebooted or abandoned and no Disney owned characters can appear or even be mentioned.

Fits perfectly.

I shared that to my facebook last night.

Disney hates Power Rangers and are the reason the deal fell through so yeah it's perfect aside from your typo

Not mine, I found it on Facebook.

Still doesn't change the typo tbh

https://screenrant.com/spiderman-son...-fans-protest/

This is getting out of hand

Whatever it takes, I don’t care. Just get Spidey back home in the MCU where he belongs.

Even if it means buying Sony.

You're talking about this as if it's the most important life-or-death thing. Calm down, the world won't end because there's one less character in a multi billion dollar movie franchise.

They could not buy Sony as a company. That would be a monopoly. Disney already is arguably. Even if they were to just buy Columbia Pictures from Sony, the governments of the USA and Japan would not allow it. Especially after the recent purchase of 20th Century Fox by Disney; Disney could not afford such a purchase at this moment and the government plus public opinion would object to yet another Disney purchase. It just would not look good for Disney which already has an image problem due to their handling of Star Wars, and among other things.

That said Disney could convince Sony to sell Columbia Pictures assets to a rival studio which would make Sony's rights to Spider-Man expire and revert back to Disney. That said Sony will still maintain a stake in Spider-Man as not only did Sony buy the film rights to Spider-Man from Marvel they also bought a stake in the character in all forms of media. Anything Disney does with Spider-Man must be signed off by Sony first.

All hope is not lost though. We may have a year without Spider-Man in the MCU as Disney and Sony continue to hash things out. If all talk is dead, Sony will move forward with a reboot as John Watts has left Sony (allegedly) and Tom Holland's contract allows for him to walk if the Sony/Disney deal falls through. Any Spider-Man films produced by Sony will likely see Dark Phoenix box office numbers due to the court of opinion objecting to yet another non-MCU Spidey. Also back in 2011 Sony sold all merchandising rights of Spider-Man back to Disney. Disney has the upper hand as they can effectively destroy any and all marketing of Sony's non-MCU Spidey films.

There is one aspect that is missing: Into The Spider-Verse sequel!

While "court of opinion" is remarkably powerful and could stifle a live-action Spidey, a follow-up to the aforementioned animated spectacular is another matter entirely. Even people who don't care for Sony's Marvel Movies or Marvel Comics in general absolutely loved that particular entry... and I agree with them!

Sony marketing such a sequel is the one thing (outside of a Spider-Gwen Movie) that Disney can't successfully inhibit!

If Sony wants their films in the MCU via a formal deal with Disney, then everything they make from here on out should reflect that!

One thing about Spiderverse is that Disney would have never let something like that happen, just like how Fox made Logan and the Deadpool movies. It's something amazing that we wouldn't have had otherwise

People like to forget that the MCU was widely acclaimed and successful even before Spidey made his debut in Captain America: Civil War.

Three new shows confirmed for Disney+:





*Ms Marvel

*Moon Knight

*She-Hulk.

Hm. On one hand, I'm a big Ms. Marvel fan; so I should be really excited about this. But something about it really rings hollow. Maybe it's just my distaste of Disney now...

In other news, US Agent will be a thing in Falcon & Bucky played by Wyatt Russell.

I was hoping Moon Knight will be on Hulu with Ghost Rider and the rumor Man-Thing series. She Hulk being in the MCU is long overdue in my opinion.

Personally I hope the tone of the show is similar to the MCU Spider-Man films while adding a pinch of The Office and Brooklyn Nine Nine to it. Basically I want it to be a courtroom comedy. And since The Eternals are a thing now, maybe have Starfox as the Fonzie/Urkel of the show occasionally dropping reference to his douchebag brother who is no longer around.

Goddamn, Disney REALLY wants to get on my good side

Black Panther 2 is set to come out in 2022.

https://www.hot97.com/news/news/waka...z1zfL_Uc7PMwa0

Nice. I would love to see T'challa vs Namor. And if they can somehow fit him in amongst the chaos,maybe Hunter aka T'challa's adoptive brother aka White Wolf the leader of Hatut Zeraze.

The only things that interest me are Wandavision, What If..., Doctor Strange into the Multiverse of Madness, She Hulk, and maybe Moon Knight. But now that Spider-Man is out of the MCU I doubt I'll watch any of it.

https://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/...sor-x-magneto/

People are freaking out over this when it is just a rumor at the moment.

People always freak out over rumors. I think studios start them just to see how the general public would react to them.

Makes sense for Mags, the MCU likes being in your face with stuff and Magneto being a PoC fits his backstory. What I'm worried about is the rumours of Ronda Rhousey as the MCU version as She Hulk. I find her to be an awful person and if I seperate art from the srtist, we're left with a bad actress

Rumour Mill is as Rumour Mill does. Why's she so bad, if you don't mind me asking (I have like 0 wrestling knowledge, so it's from that, I'm probs not going to understand.)

Long story short, she is a total nut job (She believes the Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax). While she is a decent wrestler, she is also a very bad actor. Her role in MK11 was very bad and I doubt she will be any better as She Hulk.

She's not a voice actress and does the typical "uh huh yeah I totally have the chops for this" shit teenagers who think anime dubs are done badly do. Fans of her even agree acting is not something she's good at judging by the ads she's worked on or something. Kinda off topic but I'm still confused why MK11 felt the need to get her name on the game to promote itself.

Just based on what little I have seen and know of She-Hulk, I personally think either Stephanie Beatriz, Zooey Deschanel, or Jordana Brewster would be nice candidates for the role of Jennifer Walters/She-Hulk. Heck, the She-Hulk portion of the show will probably be CGI anyways, so in the end it really boils down to who is believable as Jen Walters for me.

Spidey is back?

Spidey is back in the MCU. News broke Friday morning that Disney and Sony made a deal that Disney will contribute 25% of the financing to the third Tom Holland film and receive 25% of the profits from the box office. Spider-Man can also make a single appearance in a phase 4 film. Sony is also allowed to use Tom Holland's Spider-Man in their cinematic Spiderverse film starting with Venom 2. A lot of people are mistaking this as a finale for the MCU Spider-Man but it's actually just the start of a sharing arrangement between Disney and Sony.

Anyone read the recent Jonathan Hickman X-Men books? :rock:

YES. Holy shit, they were amazing. Maybe the best that franchise has been since the Morrison New X-Men stuff. Maybe, honestly, the best they've ever been? Mind-blowing stuff, easily the best superhero comics on the stands for the last few months.

Deadpool 3 has been confirmed to be rated R by Disney. Ryan Reynolds has met with Marvel Studios to pitch the story and awaiting the eventual green light. Rumor has it that Spider-Man and Deadpool will meet somewhere in phase 4 or 5.

I want stand alone Deadpool to be R rated, but still have him up show in other PG-13 movies for crossovers. There's a lot of jokes that you could do with him in the MCU like:

"I forgot that I can't say that because this is a family movie"
"If this movie is PG-13, I can say Fuck at least once right?....Oh shit"
"Oh hi Hulk, are you mad that you can't get another solo movie?"

Absolutely. Seriously, I think House of X and Powers of X is probably the best point to drop back in if a person has not been reading X-Men comics for a while. Probably the best setup/kind-of-a-reboot since DC Rebirth. Hickman definitely should get an Eisner for what he did.

I run a comics shop and, yep, HoX and PoX are outstanding re-entry points. We're selling about 6x what we were selling for Uncanny X-Men earlier this year. It's huge. People who haven't bought comics (X-Men or otherwise) in 2, 10, 20 years are back every week for a new X-Men chapter. Folks that wrote off the X-Men, now they're all in. A fresh start for them.

I love how it's not really a reboot, though. In fact, it leverages, in broad strokes, a lot of what other writers did with the franchise to motivate what Hickman's doing. But, yeah, it still feels totally fresh, while exciting a TON of lapsed fans. I'm expecting a bunch of newly-returned X-Men fans to be giving non-fans the HoX/PoX hardcover as a holiday gift this year.

The craziest thing to keep in mind is that HoX and Pox were the start of the story Hickman's telling. The start. Where the hell could he possibly be going with this?!

Oh yeah, forgot about this...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxAtuMu_ph4

Is the HoX/PoX Hardcover out yet? Are both titles in the same book? Are there versions of "HoX Complete" & "PoX Complete"? If they are in the same book, are they in chronological order as opposed to series-by-series order?