|
|||||||
| Community Links |
| Members List |
| Search Forums |
| Advanced Search |
| Go to Page... |
![]() |
Quote:
|
I don't think it's quite fair to say the classic look is embarrassingly bad. It was 1933, they were doing something almost totally unique. I think it looks quite good, and did not improve much until the digital age.
http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/3...933visuals.jpg http://img832.imageshack.us/img832/7...ongonaroll.jpg http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/8...ngkong1933.jpg http://img811.imageshack.us/img811/2...ong1933109.jpg |
In hindsight yeah I suppose the original isn't too bad, but the Peter Jackson version was definitely the right way to go for a detailed figure.
When I agreed with Matrixbeast I for some reason had the Toho version in mind, which is an embarrassment :lol |
Yeah the man in a monkey suit versions like in the Toho movie and 1976 remake were awful. The stop motion one from 1933 stands up against a lot of pre-digital Toho stuff IMO.
|
Does anyone here like PJ's Kong to have a snaggletooth? Because I find it to be kinda not right with me, but I might just have him in roaring face mode instead when he arrives here in the states. Nothing too major, just never liked the snaggletooth to begin with.
|
Well, there goes any sense of scale between the MonsterArt releases.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
This could be the first MonsterArts figure I may get.
|
Quote:
|
Well, I gotta go against the flow, because this "embarrassment" is the design that would get my money. I love how absurd his face is.
http://secretvortex.com/godzilla/kke01.jpg |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 AM.
|
