Exactly.

i give it to Mike. two words ...shotgun sword

Well if RJ wins he's my boy for the final.

Although I am angry at you RJ for knocking Ryan out, it's actually really depressing Mike has made it this far and Eric was knocked out like ten rounds ago.

So yeah, RJ gets my vote.

If only Kruger was here instead of Mike, although I don't think most of you would have voted for him over RJ.

I've pretty much stopped voting, since it's going like this:
Pro-Tommy: "I'm voting for Tommy because he's Tommy."
Anti-Tommy: "I'm presenting facts for why Tommy loses, but I'm still going to get labeled a hater and everyone's going to think I'm voting against Tommy because he's popular."

It's tedious, but that's how it goes down.

I got labeled the second one when I laid out why Kruger beats Tommy. So I'm with you there.

I don't think I've been labeled a hater, despite the fact that I insulted numerous items in Tommy's power set and various other aspects of his Ranger career.

That's because you're not as loud as me or Matrix :lol

I became fairly disillusioned with this early on, at first it was fun, there were some really interesting match ups and some really great discussions but it seemed the further we progressed the more friendly debates became arguments and further still the once thought out debates became simply a question of 'which character are you a fan of?' I'm not saying I'm exempt of any of this, I've done all of this as much as everyone else, as the whole thing started to collapse in on itself I was sucked right in.

Maybe next time we do this, we should more heavily control the matches, like give the characters specific locations, specific weapons, specific win requirements, specific handicaps and conditions. I know that isn't going to stop the fanboyism or whatever but it at least gives those who aren't particularly invested something to chew on and perhaps think about their vote more, to inspire greater discussion and hopefully make each vote more worthwhile.