Yes. I'd love to see more evil Riders.

I think Sentai's only seen the First/Next movies, where V3's origin was different.

I don't really know how I feel about evil Riders. I can't stand when they're just relegated to being evil like the main villains are; there's a certain aspect of it being a Rider that makes it different. I guess someone like Sasword or (what I've seen of) Chalice, who think what they're doing is right, while they're ultimately acting against themselves, is the best way to go, but I don't think it's ever been done as I exactly want it. I also prefer it when they're established and not just out of nowhere like Dark Kabuto; Shadow Moon was cool, but he was just evil because, y'know, evil.

I call it stupid because they dragged it on way too much, then Airi reveals she was aware of everything all along, then it doesn't resolve, and then it takes up the another movie just to finish up in the painfully boring Episode Red.

also i think i want to see a Dark Wizard rider due to that would work in wizard

Yea. I never watched the original Kamen Rider or V3, just the rebooted movies. Which I loved completely.

Evil Riders? Yes.

Evil repaint riders? Maybe, provided there's actually a decent story behind it and not just "because dark".

I'm the opposite...I love an evil Rider, especially when they are a mid season "whoa" moment...It helps define the hero after all. With Ryuki, the fact he had to face those of about the same power level made a difference.

I think Dark Riders is more of a concept that could be worked into a Rider show's lore rather then Black Repaint. The Dinosaur Greed could be considered a Dark Rider/ Counterpart to Eiji since they had opposite motives and goals but had the same thread of no desires. Or with Wizard, there could be a Haruto in Magic Land that went into Despair and created a Dragon Phantom, not necessarily an "Dark" Rider but more cleverly put in.

That's not a "Dark rider."
That's just a villain...

The main reason I liked evil versions of the heroes is they actually provided a challenge, most of the week monsters are poorly designed and even poorer fighters, there to make the hero look awesome more than anything else, which is fine, to a point but it was always thrilling to have an Evil Version turn up and knock them down a peg. So an Evil Version is always welcome from me, if the villains aren't putting up much of a threat which is sadly pretty often.

People have problems some of the Dark Riders because they are just evil copy and paste of the protagonist... while others are just evil with no root..... so they are villains. Every dark rider is a villain. And yeah, you can complain at me all you want for thinking Dr. Maki is a "dark rider" in spirit and not literally. Do I lose credibility for this?

Yes, having rider vs rider fights are always fun or at lest a rider who is there for their own goals like diend

No, you lose credibility because your comparison makes no sense. Maki and the Purple Greed had the same desire (The world to end), and Eiji had his own desire too (To spread happiness/prevent suffering or something along those lines).
The dark Rider of OOO was OOO, who had the desire for everything.

You're trying to treat "Dark Riders" as something more than they are, when they're not. A villain doesn't have to be a Rider to be the hero's counterpart. Eiji and Maki were counterparts, but that doesn't make the Purple Greed and Maki any more of a Rider than it does Shadowmoon.

You're making the concept of the "Dark Rider" something more than "Evil Kamen Rider," when that's all it is, which is what I'm arguing against.