|
Community Links |
Members List |
Search Forums |
Advanced Search |
Go to Page... |
![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Again, with Vader, I don't get what is inaccurate. The buttons are clearly the ones from ESB/RotJ as the pictures show. How is that inaccurate? Anyway, I'm surprised Broly is such a huge seller. I can't believe that many people are willing to buy a pathetic movie character that had no development whatsoever. Well, whatever, hopefully it will get us Nappa now. |
Thessair has pointed out exactly what is inaccurate, with explanations and pictures as evidence. if you don't see or don't care about them that's fine, same with Double, but these inaccuracies exist.
|
In this particular case... These nitpicks are actually pretty far... This is ROTJ Vader, plain and simple.
Quote:
http://www.501st.com/crl/SL_CRL/SL09...TJ/096_09a.jpg And it's right. The red lights are slightly more centered in the SHF, okay, but I hardly thing that minuscule of a difference is worth any level of complaint. Quote:
http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb2...spanels4wn.jpg Quote:
Quote:
Vader, of all characters, is undeniably an incredibly hard character to get "perfect" because his suit changes so much. This is still insanely accurate. There are inaccurate Figuarts like W, and then there is this. They aren't actually that comparable, if you have to go such inane levels to make a case. It's not "perfect" for that, no. But I hardly think you can write it off as not good enough, which would seem to be the intent of this level of analysis. |
Quote:
So, in short: I actually kind of agree with Kain on this one. Regardless of inaccuracies or no, I actually find myself looking forward to a Star Wars toy in a long time, so as long as we're getting general Figuarts quality here, I'm not complaining. Unless Amiami gyps me the Window, in which case I'm gonna go Operation Knightfall on their offices. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If the rest of you take issue with what he has to say (even though you asked him to say it, asked him for proof which he provided) then just get over it. You wanted physical evidence of inaccuracy of which there is a mountain, and now you're all dismissing him and getting on his case for doing exactly what you asked of him. So just stop now. The figure IS inaccurate, end of story. If you choose to look over those inaccuracies and buy the figure that's fine. No one says you can't. But requesting proof of the inaccuracies and arguing that the figure doesn't have it's issues despite being provided actual photo evidence, then jumping on the person you asked to do it in the first place, will not go unnoticed. So knock it off now. |
I didn't ask for anything. All I did was provide counter cases, with photo evidence, for why some may not be inaccuracies (notably the belt). Why does that need to be ignored?
--- ^Written before your edited-in second paragraph. Fine, whatever. Will drop it. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 PM.
|