Been having mixed feelings for these. Like, the whole alien aesthetic looks so generic but i wouldve been ok with it if it wasnt for the mess it forms.

Not... really. Unless you're saying it looks like a reboot of that, in which case... I could see that. I'd still be disappointed, for exactly the same reasons, but I could buy it.

Nerdist ask the same question yeah 50 feet to 250 feet if those are douglas firs. yeah that scale is very stupid. Also while i love that they have been covering the movie news someone need to tell Chris Hardwick that his creation has become a buch of aged hipsters.

Well, at least they look so much better than in the toys. At least the Sabre-Tooth tiger and the Pterodactyl does...

Not holding my breath for triceratops and mastodon, though...

Yeah.. I'm not seeing how it's impossible for there to be a window AND a heads up display.. Both cars and jets have them.. Why wouldn't a zord?

Also, say there is no window and the screens go down for whatever reason.. Then what?

Whatever. Those aren't big Rangers. Those are very tiny trees. So as not to hurt the multiple feet.

Everybody knows that's what Angel Grove is famous for. Their tiny trees.

Tanks don't and there is a very good reason for it because it's a gigantic bulls eye for someone to shoot at.


That's why you have back up cameras in things like the eyes and sensors on the machine.

That's because jets need them.
If your camera goes out on something like these, no amount of skill will let you know where your T-rex's foot is in relation to the ground because you have no depth perception since you're sitting in a tiny bubble on it's forehead. It's unnecessary.

Once the camera goes out, just because you can see outside doesn't mean you'll be able to actually pilot the damn thing.

And you still have to gauge for the tiny arms.

The most vital part of the assembly :lol