|
Community Links |
Members List |
Search Forums |
Advanced Search |
Go to Page... |
![]() |
Quote:
Also when I compared it to SICs I was only comparing just in quality and articulation. Obviously I wasn't comparring accuracy, that'd be silly. Quote:
Quote:
I'm just expecting my dissapointement because two pieces I was super excited for turned out to be (in the case of W more than Sieg) toys I'm never going to touch. It really sucks when you basically flush $30 down the toilet because the toy doesn't even achieve the basics of being a toy. Also, if you had actually read the majority of what I've said instead of jumping to rash assumptions of what I think, then you'd know that I'm not basing my opinion of the line overall off of the two I own. In fact I've explicitly stated my next Figuarts purchase is going to be Ryuki, since it's a newer release that's more likely to accurately represent the line so I'm told. (even though I don't know anythign of Ryuki) Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And I even said over and over I like Sieg a lot, but I guess that doesn't count? |
Well, to be fair, a lot of the early SICs were trash. Very much "Display, don't touch" having articulation but poor stability and even worse construction.
I'm not sure when Figuarts date back (I think '08? Maybe '09?), but SIC has had more time to make and perfect their figures. |
Quote:
Also, if you wanted to be absolutely fair, early SIC construction is fairly imfamous, yet Figuarts have supposedly been awesome all along. |
Quote:
And while SIC figures are nice but they also have QC issues and design flaws. Just like any other toyline. Like the wings on my SIC TaJaDor that won't stay plugged in at all. OR the loose ankles on SIC TaToBa that make it completely necessary for him to use a tamashii stage. And those are new releases. Look at SIC's from 5 or 6 years ago and you see a significant quality drop. SIC isn't perfect either man. Take the good and the bad, every figure can't possibly be just as good as every other figure. Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm just saying how it felt to me that when I got into this line, hearing all these great things about it, and the first figure I got was meh and the second figure I got has weird quality issues. I never said it doesn't deserve the praise it gets, just that it stinks that I happen to get the worst figures of the line first. You and everyone else have completely overblown the simplest of reactions into, what, that I'm trying to, like, slander Figaurts' good name or something? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Again, look at what has actually happened here. I said I was dissapointed in the figures I got. I never said anything about Figuarts as a whole, only referenced their popularity. Not once did I ever say, ever even come so close as to imply, that the line overall was somehow underserving. I merely lamented that the figures I own were not good compared to what I've heard, and every single person has agreed with me on that. So I'm not even sure what you're talking about or what the problem even is. I'm not saying Figuarts is bad overall, I never even implied that, and if you think I did, well sorry but you are wrong. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
That's why Sieg's legs bug me. If they're loose and like to fall off now, what happens as time goes on?
|
Pose him on his hands and call it a variant.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 AM.
|