Before we go too off topic, I somewhat like TBBT, lately Ive noticed how insanely stereotypical and insulting it can be, but thats not what this thread is for.

I just thought, might have missed it, but where did all this info come from officially?

http://collider.com/power-rangers-mo...ions-revealed/
Here ya go, boss.

I thought Big Bang Theory was nice for a quick chuckle.
Mainly because I've been in so many fandoms a lot of the jokes I can pick up on quickly.

Anyway, I don't like Zach's new character. He seems like he'd be a super interesting character in a 20 episode series, but for a movie that probably won't break 2 hours, it seems kind of pointless. Most likely, he'll come off as douchey.

Its the logical way to go. You need to establish the core team and the idea of what the Power Rangers are in the first movie before you can go and introduce a Ranger that goes against everything the Team should stand for.

And I really hope that when he appears in one of the movies they write him better than the actual show. Have him be a nice guy to the rangers and just be evil when transformed or when hes together with Rita. It always bothered me that he was always an ass to the rangers and they never picked up on him suddenly acting that way.

That's what worries me. I fear the producers will be like "Well we want the cast to be teenagers and the generation of teens love the stuff on MTV. So let's copy on what we will see is popular on MTV these days".

Thanks. Still wondering where the sites got this info though.

Ive always looked at it as major 4th wall foreshadowing...

Brilliant :lol

http://media3.giphy.com/media/mnJRjgXZ2ooh2/giphy.gif
That sounds like it'd be ass.

If they go that route, then go with the new Scream series. Even some horror fans are a little surprised by it. I'm not saying that such a formula will float everyone's boat, but it might be just tolerable enough.

Guys even if this movie blows chunks we still have the original one.