[Den-O]

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPLIT LIP

Exactly, colour swaps.

Every single one of those examples (save Hibiki who wasn't intended to be a Rider) are dramatic changes based on colour. Nobody would confuse them because the colours are a dead giveaway.

Literally the only change here is the crest, and as I've gone into detail, it's dubious at least. Your whole arguement hinges on something that is a differnet shape in an image that is heavily distorted.

I believe in court that call it reasonable doubt. Your arguement falls apart because the legitimacy of the entire image is thrown in the air when it's so messed up to begin with. That'd be like claiming he gets a new bike that shrinks the headlamp down. (which, BTW, if this is Sengoku period Gaim, why is he on a bike and not a horse?) And yet you claim my arguement has no solid basis? If what you're saying is true, than the crest is literally the only part of the image that is not severly distorted, which is very convienient.

Disregarding the Gaim image for the time being, you're actually INCORRECT again. Hibiki was 100% intended to be a rider. Read this enlightening article. http://risingsuntokusatsu.com/?p=8744

What began as a Ninja Arashi remake was scrapped and rather than creating an interim show and giving Kamen Rider a break for a year the staff got together and decided to go the rider route again. But they wanted it to be the Amazon of the Heisei era, something wildly boldly different. Hibiki was always meant to be a rider, staff interviews more than prove this.

Again, do some research before making claims. In court we call that discrediting the witness

And I can be civil enough to agree to disagree as this argument isn't really enriching the discussion for either side.