[Mesnick]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Annuga

No offense but I think there has to be a deliberate attempt at media illiteracy here if you're comparing someone who kills because he enjoys killing people without a shred of regret other than not being able to kill the man he wants to violently murder out of revenge as he's a violent sociopath to someone who did what he thought was needed to save the world and was deeply upset at causing another death after finding another way. Girori wanted Kamen Riders to be virtuous heroes and was upset by Geats not fitting his vision of an ideal Kamen Rider while also constantly winning which risked making his show boring, meaning he saw Geats as a threat to his business. These examples aren't very comparable

Then there is still Akaishi, who believed that submitting to Giff was the only way to save humanity. Moreover, his position is even more justified, because it has worked for centuries.
By the way, even if it?s off topic: it seemed to me that all Girori?s chatter about saving the world was empty chatter to lure more heroic guys into the show. That is, Hotaro or Eiji would most likely refuse to participate in the DGP because they have nothing to write on a piece of paper for wishes, but they would definitely take part in saving the world. However, many viewers, and the show itself, judging by the final episodes, take his words at face value. Maybe it's a cultural difference, but it doesn't work for me.How can one admire the heroism of the riders if they are essentially playing in the sandbox he created? How can you call them ?saviors of the world? if the main threat to this world is your game? That is, by allowing Dapan to participate, Girori literally personally added the option of the apocalypse to the list of options for the final of the DGP. So for me, his speeches about the heroism of the riders are the same as admiration for animals from a poacher.