[Mesnick]

Quote:

Originally Posted by DreadBringer

About being good faith or not, honestly, people do can think they're in the right for expressing a take they deem to be problematic/bad. Not talking about here, but even worse cases; this is why harassment in fandom is so frequent, they don't see it as "harassment" but as "heroics"; something like eath threats are just them blowing off steam and not something that could send somebody struggling over the edge. They deem these non-good faith approaches and actions as "okay" or at the very least a necessary evil that they "must" carry out. They can exaggerate a creator's behavior online or their art in order to paint them as in the right for "standing up to the big, bad showrunner."

But at the same time, is this so wrong in our time of Internet development, when dirt comes out much earlier than before? That is, Kotetsu Toys Japan Secret Base has a video where he talks about how disappointed he was after learning about the machinations of the Super-1 actor. But this is already an adult, formed person. How hard would something like this hit a child? Or is it really necessary to condone all the chaos that happens during the filming of Revice? The creation of tokusatsu, and superheroics in general, provides many bonuses for those working in these genres.
Cliche, invented technical techniques, not particularly demanding requirements for acting (there was a complaint recently, but, as time has shown, it was over), easy popularity, the possibility of long-term cooperation. At a minimum, good moral character is the minimum price to pay for such advantages.
The same applies to the ideas embedded in the show. If a hero does evil, it should be condemned or have a good reason. When most of the positive characters refuse to save an innocent girl, there must be a good reason for this. And this should not be confused with the character's flaws, which are necessary to make him alive and the plot exciting. Gentaro is the dumbest rider, but no one has a problem with it because the show doesn't make a virtue out of it. In Geats, even those moments where the hero can be scolded and his actions are really harmful may be justified by one of the viewers. And such ambiguity might be suitable for adult projects (although, ironically, those that exist are quite straightforward), but it would clearly be harmful to the target audience.