[Sean]

Quote:

Originally Posted by SideswipePrime

True, but it's not entitlement, it's just that they're, in a way, taking away peoples' freedom. It's just not good business. How long do you think screw people over without getting away with it? It's going to bite them in the butt (if it's true). I hope it's not true, but like I said, if it is...then it's a deal breaker for me. No backwards compatibility? I can see both sides of the argument, but if you want to play your 360 games...then just don't sell your 360, save a bit more, and buy the One. You'll still be able to play those games on your 360.

Yes, but at the same time, this is nowhere near new for them. Look at what we have now for the 360. You must be logged in and online in order to just play the arcade games that you paid your hard earned money on. Is that right? Hell no it isn't, but it is the way it is. Not saying that it's right, in fact it's sickening. Nobody has been causing an uproar over that though, but now all of a sudden everybody is yelling about their rights as consumers? Either go all or nothing. This is not new. And again, I really REALLY doubt that this will come to pass. Hell, I agree with you, but saying that you'll give up over a $20 difference that will support hard working developers is just ludicrous. And let's not even go into backwards compatibility. We're barely getting that as it is. I've been saying this for years about the 360 every single time my hardware failed... I feel as though I am more just licensing a rental of the games that I purchase over actually owning it. God knows the 360's won't last. It's bullshit. Whether from Sony, MS, or Nintendo. There should always be a new outlet to play what we have already purchased. There is no excuse not to have it's inclusion.