[Matrixbeast]

Quote:

Originally Posted by ComicGuy89

You're right about Tai Lung. He had an amazing prison break scene, but became a bit more comic relief towards the end.

Shen, on the other hand, may not be that strong or skilled, but was far more evil in character. His obsession with subverting destiny was genuinely scary for me. He was malicious, evil and sadistic.

Yeah. The prison break was amazing. The climax was anti-climactic.

Shen had this air about him. He was serious, he was angry, he wasn't tragic. Shen did everything right and hit every point for me. I loved him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRX

I finished watching the original X-Men trilogy. I have found that there was at least one scientific inaccuracy in each of them.

X-Men: Logan's healing factor.

When Rogue absorbed Logan's healing factor the second time, Logan's wounds should not have reopened, since they were already healed.

X2: The X-Gene being carried by the father.

All genetic diseases that are linked to the sex chromosomes occur in people because of their mother's genetics. If it was the father that carried the gene, then only males would be mutant, since it would be the Y-chromosome that would carry the gene if the father was responsible for the offspring being a mutant.

X-Men: The Last Stand: The entire nature of the cure.

The cure would have to act on every mutant cell in the body of a mutant in order to function.

I thought the Mutant Gene being carried by the father was just a joke line (Where would Wolverine learn it and why would he care, otherwise?)

And the nature of the cure was implausible from the start, but it's not something I decry. It's a plot device that makes no sense from any perspective (Such as any mutant with a physically different anatomy, such as Angel's wings or Nightcrawler's tail), and how quickly it takes effect (When Beast put his hand near Leech, his fur and claws instantly vanish, and then regrow in mere moments when he backs away. That scene alone makes no sense whatsoever).