[Sylarking]

Quote:

Originally Posted by DreadBringer

Please remember 2 things:

• Acknowledging someone's flaws and not defending them (not Wataru's) ≠ hating that person or even the whole genre.
• Any good guys, whether they're hero or anti-hero, they should not feel entitled to receive only praises and no criticisms for his/her moral decisions, including concerning the bad guy, and/or that he/she can never possibly make a morally wrong decision.

And I'm not talking about monsters only, I'm talking about someone's actions as a whole. While monsters are mostly only be able to be dealt by killing them, I'm also talking someone like Nago, where when he deals with something bad, can be just excessive like to criminals in previous episode (not letting them get away, but don't use excessive force). There's also a 2-parter in Kiva not long before before that deals with monster as living being, someone is now harmless and no longer kill (Oomura), that he deserve to live normally by then, and his trigger (bad music) can be likely dealt with something other than killing. There are times where killing a monster is clearly in the wrong, like Kuroto killing Burgmon in Ex-Aid, because that monster didn't do anything wrong in the slightest.



I mean you too, if you complain about the use of CGI in KR fights (I can't stand failure CGI too, like an abundance of it in my country's TV airing, but good CGI might deserve appreciation), it's holding back other people expressing art. Same for forcing the show to not implement plot-focus or non-favored genre like horror (I mean if it's bad it can be criticized yeah, but prefering to not do it altogether for the risk of it being bad). Though otherwise thanks for defending... a̶l̶b̶e̶i̶t̶ ̶I̶ ̶d̶o̶n̶'̶t̶ ̶n̶e̶c̶e̶s̶s̶a̶r̶i̶l̶y̶ ̶l̶i̶k̶e̶ ̶a̶n̶y̶ ̶t̶o̶k̶u̶ ̶s̶t̶u̶f̶f̶ ̶s̶p̶e̶a̶k̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶g̶e̶n̶e̶r̶a̶l̶l̶y̶,̶ ̶I̶ ̶f̶o̶l̶l̶o̶w̶ ̶K̶R̶ ̶d̶u̶e̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶i̶t̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶b̶e̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶f̶o̶r̶m̶u̶l̶a̶i̶c̶,̶ ̶b̶u̶t̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶n̶e̶c̶e̶s̶s̶a̶r̶i̶l̶y̶ ̶o̶t̶h̶e̶r̶ ̶t̶o̶k̶u̶,̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶I̶'̶m̶ ̶g̶i̶v̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶l̶o̶n̶g̶ ̶c̶o̶m̶m̶e̶n̶t̶s̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶t̶a̶k̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶a̶s̶ ̶m̶a̶n̶y̶ ̶a̶s̶p̶e̶c̶t̶s̶ ̶a̶s̶ ̶I̶ ̶c̶a̶n̶ ̶i̶s̶ ̶i̶n̶s̶p̶i̶r̶e̶d̶ ̶b̶y̶ ̶c̶e̶r̶t̶a̶i̶n̶ ̶K̶R̶ ̶s̶h̶o̶w̶ ̶r̶e̶v̶i̶e̶w̶.̶



For Inoue show comparison, it seems that Wataru will be a better dad compared to someone like, Keitaro, who spoils the "child" beyond relief. Wataru has the strictness to tell Dai-chan to not touch the violins when he only causes damage, albeit Wataru does feel regret for being too hard. I guess Wataru's nobility seems to be able to inspire Shizuka here to do the same, who several times insisted Wataru to just call the police to let them take care of Dai-chan before (albeit Shizuka's the one to urge Wataru to save him). Shizuka's impression of (she's the one telling Wataru to leave) of Dai-chan, though she's right at hindsight (but for wrong reasons), is something that people commonly said to people like Wataru in real life (though ironically someone like Wataru refers to Dai-chan as strange here) as a form of (hostility) ostracization to them, i̶n̶c̶l̶u̶d̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶m̶e̶ ̶a̶t̶ ̶o̶n̶e̶ ̶p̶o̶i̶n̶t̶.̶






For Rook being a major villain, the ones that is named after a chess piece are, I'd expect for Rook to stay for long time (though several Fangires of the week stay long time between 1986 to 2008). For a major villain who seemingly had amnesia and turned innocent, this also reminds me of Reina Mamiya/Uca Worm on Kabuto. Though I got the vibes of Dai-chan just being two-faced in 2008, seen in him eating a woman who's kindly being concerned for him (ungrateful) when Dai-chan falls in front of door. Rook is a really big troublemaker for the cast, seen currently not in 1, but 2, as both Yuri and Jirou has an intense grudge to him (and further clarifying IXA not being able to be used for those seeking vengeance means bullshit as Jirou is just the same as Yuri, and Jirou has commited more atrocity). And for Rook's cruelty to civilians in 1986, I hope this can make people realize that it can be a cruel view to wish hell for people who are deemed "boring" or "uninteresting", either a fictional character. Even if they're "boring" or "uninteresting", they don't cause harm or disadvantage to others, they don't deserve to be like, suffer or killed, there may be something wrong in someone IMO if they can't tolerate someone being "boring" or "uninteresting" in your eye.

That its why I have problem with you. You too sensitive you get easily offended at people for not liking heroric characters. Thinking them as psychopaths. Geez its just a TV show.