[The Chaos Entity]

Quote:

Originally Posted by LevisNox

This isn't personifying, as i said before if you read. I said Fool is about the journey and unlimited potential

If we go by rules while making a story. The fool would best fit the protag. As the protag is going through a journey as a kamen rider and our main char and cause unlike the others he will have more forms and form skills. It also ties in with the unlimited potential

Its merely a conpect of a idea no one is personifying. Besides if the moif is about tarrot cards they need to have the cards be tied to chars

If you don't then everyone can use the power ups or base forms which just gets chaotic

Personifying a concept is the same as tying it to a character. Death represents change, not a person in someone?s life - this is why I said it would work better as a power up than as an edgy rival. The Death card isn?t any more negative than The Emperor is.

Other Riders would be better suited being based off of the Cards that represent figures in The Fool?s life - Cards I - XII. Cards XIII - XXI represent events or concepts, and so would be better off used as power ups or gimmick items.

They also do not need to have a character for every Arcana, no. Six Riders would be plenty, with the Twenty-Two cards split between them (most of them for the main character, obviously, knowing Toei and Bandai).

And power-ups are going to be shared. Every Rider show since Gaim has had at least some form of power-up sharing. You can think it chaotic all you want, but it?s still going to happen.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mesnick

In fact, the concept of reversed cards is perhaps the most convincing argument for Toei to use of the tarot motif. You can simply swap the shoulder pads and get a completely different character / form. You don't even have to bother with repainting.

It would be such a clever way to change the meaning of the thing whilst not having to make a new suit, yeah. The Upright Lovers is about making a choice, whereas the Reversed Lovers is about feeling forced into a choice when there isn?t one. It would be so clever.