[Zolda]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Androzani84

Your original post literally said (paraphrasing) ?Women should not be Riders?. That is the very point you were being called out for, considering the idea of female Riders in prominent roles is very experimental for a show aimed at the boys demographic.

Here comes Androzani84, the member who has the best reading comprehension skill in this forum. :V

Which one of my posts that you paraphrased and referred to as my original post? Is it this one in KR Gavv's thread? If yes, then I have a bad news for you: Your paraphrase is logically faulty.

I never said nor implied that "women should not be Riders". Of course women can be Riders. I have no problem with women being Riders. What I said was: "Let a heroine be a heroine, not a Rider. A Rider heroine = A bad heroine." My point of criticism was: "A heroine should be a heroine, not having a dual role as a Rider, let alone the secondary Rider", not "women should not be Riders." I even said in this post that a heroine can also be a Rider, but it will be a very very very difficult task to do because it has to simultaneously fulfill the enormous roles of the heroine and the secondary Rider. If you think that the statement "a heroine should be a heroine, not a Rider" = "women should not be Riders", then, once again, congratulations for having the best reading comprehension skill in this forum. :V

Don't paraphrase my statement when you can simply quote it. It's worse when your paraphrase is logically faulty because it makes your paraphrase look like a straw man argument against me. Oh, and please use the word "literally" correctly because I never even said nor implied that "women should not be Riders".

My reaction after reading your post: