[Powerman293]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Locke

I thought Godzilla's design was very close to the original Godzilla, right down to looking like an obese bear with scales.

For the 2014 movie? Oh yeah I agree.

I meant the 1998 abomination "Godzilla" (now Zilla) that looked like a t-rex.

[Locke]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Powerman293

For the 2014 movie? Oh yeah I agree.

I meant the 1998 abomination "Godzilla" (now Zilla) that looked like a t-rex.

Oh yeah, he was so skinny

[Baltan II]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Locke

Btw those talking about Mothra, I assumed the flying MUTO WAS Mothra.

That would have made zero sense when the male Muto was birthed from the spore in the Philippines and then chilled for fifteen years in the Janjira plant ruins. It's not like the movie explicitly showed precisely all of that happening or something.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Locke

and that chick goes on about Gods

She and Serizawa were talking about Godzilla only at the time.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadow Moon

I had different ideas but them changing Godzilla's origin messed up things.

Godzilla's new origin messes up absolutely nothing. Even Destoroyah and Kiryu, the only monsters whose origins tie directly into the events of the first Godzilla movie, could easily be reimagined in some way that works.

[losondro]

Just remember what I said. Certain bones in a certain mine that can be used for a certain machine for the sequel. if you catch my drift.

[Locke]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baltan II

That would have made zero sense when the male Muto was birthed from the spore in the Philippines and then chilled for fifteen years in the Janjira plant ruins. It's not like the movie explicitly showed precisely all of that happening or something.

What are you even talking about here? I don't get why the plot information you've provided would make it being Mothra make zero sense? Honestly it isn't even something I really care enough about to debate, Mothra was just something referenced a lot in the movie right before we meet the MUTO and it gave it a name. You don't have to agree because there is nothing to agree with.

[Baltan II]

You're absolutely right, I reread that and realized I misinterpreted your description of those aspects as an actual origin.

In any case, thankfully the male Muto is not Mothra. If we do ever see her in these films, she's much more likely to remain faithful to classic designs than most other Toho kaiju, but I hope cues are definitely taken from the Muto on the kind of action she can provide.

[KamenRiderRevenge]

Quote:

Originally Posted by uchihabro77

I know I saw at least 3 different things that said Mothra on it, so maybe she is next? Im not a Godzilla expert, but long as it looks awesome, I dont care if he fights himself

Hopefully. What were those things, though?

[losondro]

I guess no one wants mechagodzilla in the sequel?

[jfblade]

I want to see the mechagodzilla in the sequel too although I don´t have watched those movies which got mechagodzilla in them but wants toXD (I am gonna start a Godzilla marathon in the summer)
But the one thing is for sure what I want in the sequel is Godzilla is battling with a monster in the heart of Tokyo
Although he has attacked Tokyo no less 28 times... poor TokyoXD

[Shadow Moon]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baltan II

Godzilla's new origin messes up absolutely nothing. Even Destoroyah and Kiryu, the only monsters whose origins tie directly into the events of the first Godzilla movie, could easily be reimagined in some way that works.

I mean it just messes up ideas I personally had not that it messes up the new franchise.