[ryan]

Quote:

Originally Posted by bluesparrow

Yeah I go back and forth about getting the SH Kiva... I know that six months after I do, they'll announce a SHF.

Even after they announce SHF Kiva, it'll be 6+ months before he's released, so you're talking at least a year with no Kiva in your collection.

That is a travesty. Like Matrixbeast, I've had SH Kiva for almost 2 years now, and while I know the Figuarts will blow it out of the water, it's a fun figure, and worth having until then.

But, it is your collection to do with as you please, I shouldn't be trying to convince people to spend money, even if I totally think they should.

[MidoGreen]

Quote:

Originally Posted by ryan

Even after they announce SHF Kiva, it'll be 6+ months before he's released, so you're talking at least a year with no Kiva in your collection.

That is a travesty. Like Matrixbeast, I've had SH Kiva for almost 2 years now, and while I know the Figuarts will blow it out of the water, it's a fun figure, and worth having until then.

But, it is your collection to do with as you please, I shouldn't be trying to convince people to spend money, even if I totally think they should.

Yeah, SH Kiva is worth owning IMO. Should you go whole hog and get all of the forms? No, but it's still a pretty good toy.

[ryan]

Actually, i disagree with that. The other forms are so cheap anyway, you might as well get all four. They're all really great.

[Roanstalker]

Man, Blade is so bought.

[Brainchild]

This guy looks fantastic. I can't wait to see more.

[Snowfall]

Quote:

Originally Posted by RiderSkyward

You should give it a watch, I haven't finished it yet but what I've seen is pretty awesome (it's a bit like kamen rider meets Pokemon... Sort of...)

I feel that it's worth pointing out that the only available subs for Blade are infamously bad, even by TVN standards, with most of the lines not being remotely accurate.

[ShockerCon]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snowfall

I feel that it's worth pointing out that the only available subs for Blade are infamously bad, even by TVN standards, with most of the lines not being remotely accurate.

I don't get the hate for TVN. If it's not HK, then it's probably fine.

[Matrixbeast]

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShockerCon

I don't get the hate for TVN. If it's not HK, then it's probably fine.

It's a combination of absolutely piss poor video quality and some lines that border HK levels of poor translations (Note: I can't understand Japanese, but from what I heard, there are some hefty errors).

[Den-O]

Blades video quality is pretty subpar but no one can really fault any sub group for that. That is unless you're willing to front them the $200+ to purchase DVD/Blu-ray box sets so they can rip higher quality raws on the older shows.

[ShockerCon]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matrixbeast

It's a combination of absolutely piss poor video quality and some lines that border HK levels of poor translations (Note: I can't understand Japanese, but from what I heard, there are some hefty errors).

Ryuki was 2 years before Blade, and it looked fine to me. Unless Blade looks worse for some reason.

I'm actually not sure if you're talking about Blade or TV-N in general...