|
Community Links |
Members List |
Search Forums |
Advanced Search |
Go to Page... |
![]() |
Quote:
|
https://i.imgur.com/dbgXNIj.png
Who did it better? |
Kuuga, no question. All of them keep it very simple and all have something interesting going for them.
Aside from Dogga which is a surprisingly well balanced design, Kiva's forms suffer from the same thing most Kiva designs do; overdesigned and messy to the point of just not being good at all. I get what they're going for with each one but they just don't look great. |
Kuuga, no question. All of them keep it very simple and all have something interesting going for them.
Aside from Dogga which is a surprisingly well balanced design, Kiva's forms suffer from the same thing most Kiva designs do; overdesigned and messy to the point of just not being good at all. I get what they're going for with each one but they just don't look great. |
I just see four kings that need not be pitted against each other.
(My preference leans towards Kuuga too) |
Kuuga. While I love Kiva's design to death, there's something about Kuuga that makes it stands out namely, it feels like each form of Kuuga ia good enough to be a main form, whereas you look at Kiva and you can tell that the three forms are just extensions of the Kiva form, not that it is a bad thing.
|
Quote:
|
I’ll go for Kiva, since each form has a very clear fighting style and actually uses the weapons to finish things off. I don’t really remember seeing that kind of change up in Kuuga and they used the form changing gimmick a lot longer.
|
Quote:
|
Kuuga. I am very biased hinestly but Kuuga's forms change most of the suit rather than just one arm and the the chest piece
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:58 PM.
|