The Marvelous Marvel Comics Thread

Electric Turahk · 12-10-2014, 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRX

So... I have to wait until March for new episodes of Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.?

*Sighs.*

At least it can't get any—

I know, right?! D:

Who did Raina become?! What will SkyeDaisy do next? WHY, TRIP, WHY?!

I want to be interested in Agent Carter... but interrupting S.H.I.L.D. like that for her show? Ugh, don't think that was smart...

ElConvoy · 12-10-2014, 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Electric Turahk

I want to be interested in Agent Carter... but interrupting S.H.I.L.D. like that for her show? Ugh, don't think that was smart...

Well its not interrupting Shield. Shield is in its mid season break so there would be no new shield episodes either way. With Agent Carter we now get more Shield action than we would have without the show. And I bet you that the Carter show will deal with alot of the things we saw in Shield this past season.

Electric Turahk · 12-10-2014, 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElConvoy

Well its not interrupting Shield. Shield is in its mid season break so there would be no new shield episodes either way. With Agent Carter we now get more Shield action than we would have without the show. And I bet you that the Carter show will deal with alot of the things we saw in Shield this past season.

Ignoring my disdain for mid-season breaks.... Aren't they usually only for like a month? And S.H.I.E.L.D. won't be back for over three because Carter will be airing? That's "interrupting" to me.

---

Oh, and regarding Marvel/Sony... The thing I find interesting is the bit that Sony supposedly pitched the idea of new Spider-Man produced by Marvel but distributed by Sony. And that fell through. That would seemingly be due to Marvel not agreeing So I'm taking from that that they're being stubborn and want all or nothing... So it's not really one-sided blame.

ElConvoy · 12-10-2014, 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Electric Turahk

Ignoring my disdain for mid-season breaks.... Aren't they usually only for like a month? And S.H.I.E.L.D. won't be back for over three because Carter will be airing? That's "interrupting" to me.

It wasnt that different with the first season though. We got two episodes at the beginning of january and only one episode at the beginning of february. So its not really that we are missing out on anything by just moving those three episodes back a bit to flesh out the back story of the inhuman artifacts and the kree through agent carter.

Thessair · 12-10-2014, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElConvoy

It wasnt that different with the first season though. We got two episodes at the beginning of january and only one episode at the beginning of february. So its not really that we are missing out on anything by just moving those three episodes back a bit to flesh out the back story of the inhuman artifacts and the kree through agent carter.

Ayup. Of course, Agent Carter has the twofer bonus of 40s period drama and Hayley Atwell. It will make a nice change for a few weeks.

ElConvoy · 12-10-2014, 10:24 AM

I dont mind looking at Hayley Atwell for a few weeks instead of Clark Gregg.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Electric Turahk

Oh, and regarding Marvel/Sony... The thing I find interesting is the bit that Sony supposedly pitched the idea of new Spider-Man produced by Marvel but distributed by Sony. And that fell through. That would seemingly be due to Marvel not agreeing So I'm taking from that that they're being stubborn and want all or nothing... So it's not really one-sided blame.

He pitched the idea of the trilogy to the sony execs and they didnt want to do it.

Thessair · 12-10-2014, 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElConvoy

I dont mind looking at Hayley Atwell for a few weeks instead of Clark Gregg.

Electric Turahk · 12-10-2014, 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElConvoy

I dont mind looking at Hayley Atwell for a few weeks instead of Clark Gregg.

He pitched the idea of the trilogy to the sony execs and they didnt want to do it.

Ahhh, now I understand better. Yeah that's different and ridiculous for its own reasons...

ElConvoy · 12-11-2014, 10:31 AM

Come on Marvel please dont do this shit.

http://www.newsarama.com/22948-did-m...-spoilers.html

Electric Turahk · 12-11-2014, 10:59 AM

So... they're seemingly retconning them into Inhumans in the comics even...?

I still think Marvel really isn't innocent in all this... That's pretty petty.

12-10-2014, 09:45 AM	#1161
Electric Turahk Tokusatsu Hero Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 5,525	Quote: Originally Posted by KRX So... I have to wait until March for new episodes of Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.? Sighs. At least it can't get any— I know, right?! D: Who did Raina become?! What will SkyeDaisy do next? WHY, TRIP, WHY?! I want to be interested in Agent Carter... but interrupting S.H.I.L.D. like that for her show? Ugh, don't think that was smart... __________________

12-10-2014, 10:01 AM	#1163
Electric Turahk Tokusatsu Hero Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 5,525	Quote: Originally Posted by ElConvoy Well its not interrupting Shield. Shield is in its mid season break so there would be no new shield episodes either way. With Agent Carter we now get more Shield action than we would have without the show. And I bet you that the Carter show will deal with alot of the things we saw in Shield this past season. Ignoring my disdain for mid-season breaks.... Aren't they usually only for like a month? And S.H.I.E.L.D. won't be back for over three because Carter will be airing? That's "interrupting" to me. --- Oh, and regarding Marvel/Sony... The thing I find interesting is the bit that Sony supposedly pitched the idea of new Spider-Man produced by Marvel but distributed by Sony. And that fell through. That would seemingly be due to Marvel not agreeing So I'm taking from that that they're being stubborn and want all or nothing... So it's not really one-sided blame. __________________

12-10-2014, 10:24 AM	#1166
ElConvoy Half-Boiled Lifestyle. Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: Bonn, Germany Posts: 5,623	I dont mind looking at Hayley Atwell for a few weeks instead of Clark Gregg. Quote: Originally Posted by Electric Turahk Oh, and regarding Marvel/Sony... The thing I find interesting is the bit that Sony supposedly pitched the idea of new Spider-Man produced by Marvel but distributed by Sony. And that fell through. That would seemingly be due to Marvel not agreeing So I'm taking from that that they're being stubborn and want all or nothing... So it's not really one-sided blame. He pitched the idea of the trilogy to the sony execs and they didnt want to do it. Last edited by ElConvoy; 12-10-2014 at 10:26 AM..

12-10-2014, 10:40 AM	#1168
Electric Turahk Tokusatsu Hero Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 5,525	Quote: Originally Posted by ElConvoy I dont mind looking at Hayley Atwell for a few weeks instead of Clark Gregg. He pitched the idea of the trilogy to the sony execs and they didnt want to do it. Ahhh, now I understand better. Yeah that's different and ridiculous for its own reasons... __________________

12-11-2014, 10:59 AM	#1170
Electric Turahk Tokusatsu Hero Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 5,525	So... they're seemingly retconning them into Inhumans in the comics even...? I still think Marvel really isn't innocent in all this... That's pretty petty. __________________