|
Community Links |
Members List |
Search Forums |
Advanced Search |
Go to Page... |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#2231 |
Dai Shogun
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 7,756
|
Accurate by my standards, which obviously don't compare to yours. I'm not trying to set up facts here. Sorry I haven’t expressed that clearly.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2232 |
Tokusatsu Hero
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 5,525
|
Does it look like Vader?
Yeah. Look better than the 6" Black Series? Yeah. Plenty good enough for me.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2233 |
OCP--Directive 4
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Skutttlebutt, Over NYC
Posts: 1,327
|
Quote:
Wow, what? Any examples for that?
I think the figure is very accurate, I even got my Kotobukiya-statue down which I think has a very sculpt and I can't spy any difference. Talking from pictures of course, you would need to have the figure in hand to really compare them. I think the sculpt is great and I can't see any major difference, especially not in comparison with how different the Double SHF looks to the actual suit. Don't forget that there's also no "define" version of the helmet and in some instances the suit, it was constantly worked on during the original trilogy and does look different from time to time. Quote:
There are definitive versions of the suit. Each film has a very specific suit and configuration of the components on that suit. There are ANH,ESB, RotJ, and RotS helmets, should armor, shin guards, belt boxes, chestboxes. Each film has a unique Vader suit and fairly maintained continuity within a particular film. The obvious exceptions being modifications made for both the unmasked Vader scenes in Empire and Jedi.
I'm only going with these two examples because there aren't enough clear shots with proper lighting to dissect the helmet right now and the shoulder armor, while also inaccurate, isn't as blatantly obvious. Here are two shots of the SHF: ![]() ![]() Belt Boxes: ![]() The closest to the SHF here are the ESB/RotJ boxes. That makes sense since this is supposed to be the RotJ Vader, as evidenced by the bonus display base and the missing hand. However, not one single button is placed properly here. They don't match up at all. It's pretty self explanatory. Chestbox: ![]() The chestbox, on the other hand, is some sort of bizarre Frankenstein. The large rocker switches at the bottom are in the configuration of ESB/RotJ, but they are solid colors, like ANH/RotS. They are lacking the proper black outer coloring of the ESB/RotJ pieces and the silver sliders in between. Additionally, the upper and lower colored panels in the upper right are blue and red, per ESB/RotJ, but are also missing the sliders. The Aurabesh text is missing for a proper ESB/RotJ. The rod detailing is also incorrect for any version of the unit. Cape Chain: ![]() The cape chain is probably the most inaccurate piece, not matching up to any version of the character. My point was that people can like a figure but that it doesn't matter one whit when it comes to judging its accuracy. Edit: I also forgot to mention that the Vader figure is being reported as ~155mm in height. Converted, that comes out to about 6'1" or so. David Prowse alone was 6'5", not counting the additional height from the costume pieces. Quote:
Thanks for the read, but that's just nit-picks for me, nothing I would ever notice or care about. If that's all that is inaccurate with the figure I don't care about it
![]() And I do remember hearing something about them working on the details of the suit all the time and it changed during filming, I was wrong then. Quote:
Yeah. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2234 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Englewood CO
Posts: 10,893
|
Sorry dude, but it looks exactly like Vader. I don't see how those button thingies you posted are any different than what the Figuart has. In fact, I never even knew he had different button thingies. Probably because it is something that is hardly noticeable and not worth caring about to begin with. It changes nothing in who the character is and what he looks like.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2235 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Lexington, Ky
Posts: 16,328
|
I believe it's worth caring about for sure. In much the same way it kills me that the W, Agito, etc other rider SHFs are so inaccurate but people give them a pass and say "meh good enough stop nitpicking". I totally respect that someone has legit complaints about this thing being a Vader-stein of design elements and variations of the actual costume.
Would i care about those things? Not so much. For me the costume has some fluidity to it because of the previously stated changes to it over the course of the saga. But I'm not going to argue with someone who clearly recognizes it's inaccuracies as though they're incorrect. Thessair is of course 100% correct that the toy is some weirdly amalgamated inaccuracy. If the inaccuracies don't bother you that's fine, they don't have to. But to argue that they don't exist is just stupid. At the very least we should all be able to agree it's the nicest Vader figure out there and is leaps and bounds better than the eyesore that is the 6" Black Series Vader. That fucking monstrosity towers over other figures in that line, it's not even appropriately tall, just stupidly.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2236 |
Go beyond...PLUS ULTRA!!!
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Higher than you'd think, but lower than you'd hope.
Posts: 7,044
|
Quote:
Look, I like Blue lightsabers too...but Jedi Luke is better. ![]() Quote:
There are definitive versions of the suit. Each film has a very specific suit and configuration of the components on that suit. There are ANH,ESB, RotJ, and RotS helmets, should armor, shin guards, belt boxes, chestboxes. Each film has a unique Vader suit and fairly maintained continuity within a particular film. The obvious exceptions being modifications made for both the unmasked Vader scenes in Empire and Jedi.
I'm only going with these two examples because there aren't enough clear shots with proper lighting to dissect the helmet right now and the shoulder armor, while also inaccurate, isn't as blatantly obvious. Here are two shots of the SHF: ![]() ![]() Belt Boxes: ![]() The closest to the SHF here are the ESB/RotJ boxes. That makes sense since this is supposed to be the RotJ Vader, as evidenced by the bonus display base and the missing hand. However, not one single button is placed properly here. They don't match up at all. It's pretty self explanatory. Chestbox: ![]() The chestbox, on the other hand, is some sort of bizarre Frankenstein. The large rocker switches at the bottom are in the configuration of ESB/RotJ, but they are solid colors, like ANH/RotS. They are lacking the proper black outer coloring of the ESB/RotJ pieces and the silver sliders in between. Additionally, the upper and lower colored panels in the upper right are blue and red, per ESB/RotJ, but are also missing the sliders. The Aurabesh text is missing for a proper ESB/RotJ. The rod detailing is also incorrect for any version of the unit. Cape Chain: ![]() The cape chain is probably the most inaccurate piece, not matching up to any version of the character. My point was that people can like a figure but that it doesn't matter one whit when it comes to judging its accuracy. Edit: I also forgot to mention that the Vader figure is being reported as ~155mm in height. Converted, that comes out to about 6'1" or so. David Prowse alone was 6'5", not counting the additional height from the costume pieces.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2237 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Englewood CO
Posts: 10,893
|
Quote:
I believe it's worth caring about for sure. In much the same way it kills me that the W, Agito, etc other rider SHFs are so inaccurate but people give them a pass and say "meh good enough stop nitpicking". I totally respect that someone has legit complaints about this thing being a Vader-stein of design elements and variations of the actual costume.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2238 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Lexington, Ky
Posts: 16,328
|
Quote:
Except I don't see what makes W and OOO inaccurate to their suits either. I look at my W and I look at the W on screen and they are identical. There is nothing on Vader that looks at all inaccurate. The buttons look just like the pictures posted. So sorry, I fail to see Vader as frankensteined.
And W is clearly inaccurate to the suit from the show as well. It's one of the most outdated and inaccurate figuarts out there, right up top with the original Kuuga release & Agito in terms of being very poor representations of the actual characters. That's been widely discussed multiple times on this forum for the last 3 years. If you can't see that, again, I don't really know what else to tell you. If you could at least tell there was an issue and it didn't bother you that would be one thing, but as is you just choose to believe the problem doesn't exist in the first place.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2239 |
Tokusatsu Hero
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,294
|
Quote:
Except I don't see what makes W and OOO inaccurate to their suits either. I look at my W and I look at the W on screen and they are identical. There is nothing on Vader that looks at all inaccurate. The buttons look just like the pictures posted. So sorry, I fail to see Vader as frankensteined.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2240 |
Go beyond...PLUS ULTRA!!!
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Higher than you'd think, but lower than you'd hope.
Posts: 7,044
|
Quote:
Except I don't see what makes W and OOO inaccurate to their suits either. I look at my W and I look at the W on screen and they are identical. There is nothing on Vader that looks at all inaccurate. The buttons look just like the pictures posted. So sorry, I fail to see Vader as frankensteined.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 PM.
|